Visceral Fat vs. Subcutaneous Fat: What the Research Really Says—And How We Can Help You Target It

You’ve likely encountered claims on social media suggesting that visceral fat is harder to lose due to hormonal influences.  However, current research provides a more nuanced understanding of fat loss dynamics. 

Understanding Visceral and Subcutaneous Fat

  • Subcutaneous Fat: Located just beneath the skin, this fat is visible and pinchable. While it’s less harmful metabolically, excessive amounts can still pose health risks. 
  • Visceral Fat: Found deeper within the abdominal cavity, this fat surrounds vital organs. It’s more metabolically active and has been linked to increased risks of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.  

______________________________________________________________________

What Does the Research Say?

Contrary to popular belief, visceral fat may be more responsive to weight loss interventions:

  • Percentage Loss: Studies indicate that during weight loss, the percentage reduction of visceral fat often surpasses that of subcutaneous fat.  
  • Absolute Loss: Despite higher percentage losses, the absolute amount of subcutaneous fat lost can be greater due to its larger initial volume. 

______________________________________________________________________

Hormonal Influences on Fat Distribution

Hormones play a significant role in determining fat distribution:

  • Estrogen: Higher estrogen levels are associated with increased subcutaneous fat storage, particularly in the hips and thighs. Post-menopausal decreases in estrogen can lead to a relative increase in visceral fat accumulation.  
  • Cortisol: Chronic stress elevates cortisol levels, which has been linked to increased visceral fat deposition.  

______________________________________________________________________

Measuring Fat Accurately: The Body Composition Clinic at Antigravity Wellness

At Antigravity Wellness, we offer comprehensive body composition assessments through our monthly Body Composition Clinic. Utilizing ultrasound technology, we provide:

  • Precise measurements of total body fat percentage
  • Assessment of visceral fat levels
  • Evaluation of lean muscle mass
  • Tracking of progress over time

This non-invasive method offers a clearer picture of your body’s composition, enabling targeted and effective interventions. 

______________________________________________________________________

Personalized Strategies for Optimal Body Composition

Recognizing that each individual’s body is unique, we tailor our approach to meet your specific needs:

  • Functional lab testing to identify hormonal or metabolic imbalances
  • Customized meal planning aligned with your health goals and dietary preferences
  • Strength training programs designed to build lean muscle and boost metabolism
  • Stress management and sleep optimization strategies to mitigate cortisol-induced fat retention
  • Supplement recommendations to support fat loss, hormonal balance, and overall energy levels

Our holistic approach ensures that you receive a comprehensive plan addressing all facets of body composition and health.

______________________________________________________________________

Ready to Take the Next Step?

Join us at our upcoming First Friday Body Composition Clinic in Kennewick, WA. Experience a detailed ultrasound assessment and receive a personalized plan to guide your journey toward optimal health.

Book your appointment today and embark on a path to a healthier, more balanced you.

______________________________________________________________________

References

1. Smith SR, Lovejoy JC, Greenway F, et al. (2001). Contributions of total body fat, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments, and visceral adipose tissue to the metabolic complications of obesity. Metabolism, 50(4), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1053/meta.2001.21093

2. Lee JJ, Pedley A, Hoffmann U, et al. (2016). Visceral and intrahepatic fat are associated with adverse cardiometabolic risk factors, even in lean individuals. Circulation, 133(11), 1057–1065. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016753

3. Kuk JL, Katzmarzyk PT, Nichaman MZ, et al. (2006). Visceral fat is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in men. Obesity, 14(2), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.43

4. Muscogiuri G, Barrea L, Laudisio D, et al. (2023). Role of estrogen in visceral fat accumulation and insulin resistance in women. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 14:1170672. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1170672/full

5. Epel ES, McEwen B, Seeman T, et al. (2000). Stress and body shape: stress-induced cortisol secretion is consistently greater among women with central fat. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62(5), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200009000-00005

6. Chaston TB, Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. (2007). Changes in fat-free mass during significant weight loss: a systematic review. International Journal of Obesity, 31(5), 743–750. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803483

7. Ross R, Dagnone D, Jones PJH, et al. (2000). Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men: a randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 133(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-133-2-200007180-00008

You might also enjoy